I don't usually post what others have written, but this is too important not to pass on in case you missed it elsewhere. I generally prefer to write about what we can do at home for ourselves to combat what the government is doing against our Health and Well-Being, but sometimes that is not enough.
Genetically Modified Crops in the Food Supply: The Threat to Your Health
by Judith McGeary, Esq. – May 9, 2011
by Judith McGeary, Esq. – May 9, 2011
"The case against genetically modified (GM) crops has been growing for years. While there are no long-term studies on the health effects of eating food from GM crops, even short-term studies have raised very troubling questions. For example, a panel of scientists in India recently reviewed studies that purported to show that GM crops modified to produce Bt were safe. The reviewers concluded that the studies did not meet international standards, did not accurately summarize the results, and “ignored toxic endpoints” that occurred in rats that were fed the GM grain for just 3 months. The rats suffered organ and system damage to ovaries, spleens, and the immune system, and demonstrated toxic effects to the liver [L. Gallagher, BT Brinjal Event EEa: The Scope and Adequacy of the GEAC Toxicological Risk Assessment: Review of Oral Toxicity Studies in Rats (2010)]. Other studies have come to similar conclusions, namely that even a relatively short period of feeding GM foods to lab animals indicate serious potential health impacts.
Despite that, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to allow GM crops to enter our food supply without labeling, leaving the majority of Americans in the dark about the fact that almost every processed food contains ingredients from GM corn, soy, and/ or canola.
As serious as these problems are, the concerns over GM crops rose to an even higher level recently. On January 17, 2011, Dr. Don M. Huber, an internationally recognized plant pathologist and Professor Emeritus from Purdue University, sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack warning him of a previously unknown pathogen that "should be treated as an emergency." As explained in the letter, the pathogen poses a serious threat to plant health, animal health, and potentially human health – and has been connected to GM crops engineered to be resistant to the herbicide Roundup, whose active ingredient is glyphosate.
“Roundup Ready” crops, as they are called, allow farmers to spray the herbicide glyphosate to kill weeds throughout the growing season. This has two effects: it significantly increases the amount of glyphosate used, and results in glyphosate residues on the crop itself.
As outlined in Dr. Huber’s letter and subsequent materials, veterinarians first identified this organism in livestock herds experiencing extremely high rates, up to 45%, of spontaneous abortions and infertility rates of 20% and higher. The vets confirmed that the pathogen was the cause of the problem, and then searched for the source of the pathogen, ultimately finding it in the animals’ feed. The contaminated feeds were made from Roundup Ready soy, Roundup Ready corn, and crops raised for feed in fields treated with glyphosate.
The connection was then made with plant pathologists who have been working to understand the growing scope and severity of plant diseases such as Goss’ Wilt in corn and Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) in soybeans. When examined, the new pathogen was found in very high levels in the infected crops.
Dr. Huber’s January letter urged Secretary Vilsack not to approve Roundup Ready alfalfa and to conduct research on the relationship between Roundup Ready crops, glyphosate, and this new pathogen. The USDA chose to ignore this warning and less than three weeks later approved two new GMO crops, including Monsanto’s Roundup Ready alfalfa, creating a threat to the primary forage feed crop for US livestock.
The letter, although intended to be confidential, was leaked by a third party, after which Dr. Huber gave permission for the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance and others to post it. The now-public letter unleashed a storm of accusations and recriminations, including a quick response from Monsanto. Yet, while Monsanto and its allies attacked the letter, they presented no evidence that contradicted it – just their own unsupported claims that circled around Dr. Huber’s statements without addressing them directly.
At the request of other scientists and European leaders, Dr. Huber wrote a second, more in-depth letter in March which can be read at the Farm and Ranch Freedom website.
Food Democracy Now! released an exclusive 20-minute interview with Dr. Huber. We encourage everyone to view it and share it with their friends and neighbors. If you have trouble downloading the full video because of the file size, shorter segments of it are posted on the website of Food Democracy Now!
The FDA should impose an immediate moratorium on GM alfalfa and sugar beets."
Can someone tell me WHY the FDA doesn't put our health interests in the forefront, other than Follow the Money??
Food safety is a very important issue that is requiring us to be well informed to make the best food choices. Thank you for posting. I watched this video: KarmaTube: An Unlikely Crusader for Food Safety
ReplyDeletewww.karmatube.org. What I found especially interesting is that other countries aren't allowing these gmo foods/practices & that US companies are modifying their exports to meet those standards while selling gmo's here.
Thanks, Michelle. Perhaps there's hope in today's (albeit reluctant) agreement by the US delegation to Codex Alimentarius' GMO labeling. That may eventually open the way to GMO labeling here in the US.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.consumersinternational.org/
Here is another link:
ReplyDeletehttp://blog.friendseat.com/how-to-id-genetically-modified-food-at-the-supermarket
that I thought you'd like.
Thanks!
ReplyDeletecopied your post and sent it to a Vet PhD fellow that is connected to my Flickr account. Here is his reply:
ReplyDelete"
Here's the full text of the letter.
That's a lot of outrageous claims and very little actual data to back it up, so I'd rather withhold judgment until results of their investigations become available.
But regardless of the validity of Dr. Huber's claims, I find Monsanto's "roundup-ready" business model utterly repulsive. Don't get me wrong, I am an avid proponent of genetic engineering and I do think that there's a lot of good it can do not only in agriculture. Improving crops is great, but making them pesticide-resistant just so you can then kill off literally everything else with truckloads of poison? In my eyes, that's irresponsible, if not downright evil."
Pam (lilypon)
Pam, Good to see you here! I was just thinking about you 2-3 days ago, wondering how you are.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the post. I doubt we'll ever have much media coverage of proven research data that shows harm from GMO's in our foods.
I do think there's much good that can come from genetic engineering, for example in medical research. I just wish they'd stop adulterating my foods and killing my planet. :)